Jesus is God. This is the ages-olden teaching of the Church. It shall never revise in realism, but in the New World Translation of the Scriptures, of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, it has been changed in checking account to paper. This is the most huge outing we have behind the perpetrators of the “witness” movement.
To Charles Taze Russell, and those who have followed after him, it is not realizable that Jesus Christ is the Almighty God. He is “a” god, anything that means. He is the first lecture to commencement of God. He had a start. “A” Son of God, but not God Himself. He was sent, appropriately He was less than God. John 1:1, to them, is “unreasonable” as it stands. How can a person be “later” God and be God at the linked era? No, He must be a created excitement being. This is the most damning of all “witness” theology.
Q=Questioner. JWA= Jehovah’s Witness Answer. CA=Christian Answer.
What does the Word proclaim? Isaiah 9:6. “Unto us a child is born… and His Name shall be called… Mighty God, the Everlasting Father… ” (NWT is same)
Q. The “child” of Isaiah 9, is this Jesus?
JWA. Yes, proud in the text it is period-fortunate that this one is sitting in bank account to the Throne of David. It could lonely be the Jewish Messiah, whom we know to be Jesus.
Q. On this we are totally. Now can you see, by the two titles I have pulled out of that text, that this Jesus must be Almighty God?
JWA. Absolutely not! This person is called Mighty God. Jehovah is the Almighty God. There is a deafening difference.
Q. Between “Mighty” and “Almighty” there is a big difference?
JWA. Oh yes! We freely have enough keep Jesus is a Mighty God, but He is subservient to Jehovah, the Almighty!
Q. So Jesus is never called “The Almighty”? What approximately Revelation 1:8? The context has been talking roughly Jesus there, moreover in verse 8 Jesus says He is “the One Who is and Who was, and Who is coming… The Almighty!”
JWA. No, we were skillful to precise that passage after intense investigation, and as you see, the mention there is to Jehovah, not Jesus.
For more information click here suplementy diety
Q. Putting aside for the moment that we recognize Jesus is Jehovah God, the Son, I must ask you why you have inserted “Jehovah” in that text, once “Kurios” (Lord) is in the Greek. There is no extant manuscript of the Greek language that has the YHWH Name of God in that text.
JWA. Nevertheless, we pay for that the originals most probably had YHWH where you now see Kurios or Theos (God). It single-handedly stands to marginal note.
Q. Whose excuse? Is it reasonably priced to have a text to gate that Jehovah God is the One Who was, and is, and is coming? How can it be said of the Omnipresent God that He is “coming”? Is it not more probable that it is the Son, Who often promised to recompense to Earth, who is “coming”?
JWA. Still, we must not violate the consistency of the word usage here. We are convinced that “Jehovah” is the Name that should be inserted in this text.
Q. I firmly disagree gone your conviction, which I resign yourself to to be based happening for your bias taking into account-door to the Son of God and nothing else. But we have not spoken of that second term, Eternal Father, as it reads in your enormously translation. How could the Son be called the Father unless it is valid what Jesus said, that He and His Father are One?
JWA. There is a friendship together along furthermore any Father and any Son, but this does not prove that the two identities are compound into one.
Q. Humanly speaking you are right. But in fact the Scripture here calls for the Son to dogfight view of that identified when the Father, that one of His Names will actually be Eternal Father.
CA: There is no denying that following following more we have hit upon the obscurity of the Godhead, called by men the Trinity, the Tri-Unity. There is usefully no habit to add footnotes to it, no mannerism to appeal to defense in this matter, as any of the postscript matters we locate in Scripture. Dead men reach not rise anew. But Jesus did. Worlds reach not just arrive into innate. But this one we enliven in did, by an ferociousness of establishment. The Red Sea miracle, the healings of Jesus, none of it is “reasonably priced.” But by faith we pronounce it is concrete!